Skip to main content

CAIRN + KINDLING · CLEAR THINKING ESSENTIALS

Lesson 17: Appeal to Novelty

Spot the Faulty Logic

“You should switch to this new study method - it’s the latest technique that was just developed this year! The old ways of studying are outdated.”

Discussion: Talk with your teacher about this example. What seems wrong with this reasoning?

How/Why It’s Often Used

Our culture often celebrates newness. “New and improved” is a powerful marketing phrase. There’s an excitement about trying the latest thing, and sometimes newer really is better. But the assumption that new automatically equals better is a logical shortcut that doesn’t always hold true.

This fallacy is heavily used in advertising (for products, apps, technologies) and in discussions about methods, ideas, or practices. It’s the opposite of Appeal to Tradition - both make the mistake of judging something based on its age rather than its actual merits.

Appeal to Novelty in Action

Did you spot the faulty logic?

The argument gives no evidence that the new study method actually works better - just that it’s new. Proven study techniques that have helped students for decades might actually be more effective than an untested new approach.

Second Example

“Why are you still reading physical books? E-readers are newer technology. You should switch!”

The Flaw

The newness of e-readers doesn’t make them better for everyone. Physical books and e-readers each have advantages and disadvantages. The right choice depends on personal preferences and circumstances, not just which is newer.